Reviews

‘Tests of Astrology’: scientifically objective or biased?by Jan Ruis Recently ‘Tests of Astrology’ by Dean, Mather, Nias & Smit was published as the successor to ‘Astrology under Scrutiny ‘. The authors are very ambitious: they intend to give an objective assessment and evaluation of more or less all the relevant astrological studies to date, and …

Reviewer Number 2 – ‘Tests of Astrology’: scientifically objective or biased? Read More »

Reviewer Number 1 – MAJOR COMMENTS from Kyösti Tarvainen 1.(i) The Gauguelin research: misleading continues Dr. Geoffrey Dean again claims (Section 6.9.2) that almanacs earlier presented Gauquelin plus zones as fortunate places for planets. This claim is, however, based on a translation error. He has translated the French expression “en l’ascendant ou au mileu du …

Reviewer Number 1 – MAJOR COMMENTS from Kyösti Tarvainen Read More »